Internal Equity: A Closer Look at Pay Compression in Today’s Workplace


In a dynamic and competitive workforce, companies need to prioritize internal equity as a cornerstone of their compensation strategy. Internal equity is about fairness in pay among employees within the same company, ensuring that those with similar roles, skills, responsibilities, and working conditions are compensated consistently. But it’s more than just comparing job titles—it’s about creating a culture that encompasses a sense of fairness and integrity within the organization.

Why Internal Equity Matters

Internal equity isn’t just a numbers game; it’s about creating a workplace where employees feel valued and are treated fairly. When people believe they’re being paid fairly compared to their colleagues, it builds trust, boosts morale, and improves job satisfaction. According to a 2023 survey by Pew Research, 63% of employees who felt their pay was fair were much happier with their jobs than those who felt underpaid. This sense of fairness is crucial, especially in a competitive job market where retaining talent is harder than ever.

Understanding Pay Compression

Achieving internal equity comes with challenges, one of the biggest being pay compression—a sneaky issue that can disrupt even the most thought-out pay structures. Pay compression happens when there’s little difference in pay between employees, regardless of their experience, skills, or length of service. This often occurs when starting salaries for new hires are set too close to what long-term employees earn, usually as a response to market pressures. For example, in a competitive job market, companies may offer high starting salaries to attract new hires, which can end up matching or even exceeding the pay of more seasoned employees. This can lead to dissatisfaction among existing staff and increase the risk of losing experienced talent.

The Economic Policy Institute highlighted this issue, noting that new college graduates’ wages rose by 8.9% between 2019 and 2022, while the average worker’s pay only grew by 4.6% during the same period. This gap is a classic indication of pay compression, where salary increases for new hires outpace adjustments for current employees, creating internal equity challenges that can be tough to rectify.

The Impact of Internal Inequities

Internal inequities, including pay compression, can have serious downsides for a company. First, it can lower employee motivation and engagement. When long-standing employees see newcomers earning nearly as much—or sometimes even more—without the same level of experience, it can breed resentment and feelings of being undervalued. In a world where pay transparency is not only expected but now required, compensation information is often shared readily amongst peers. A recent survey by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) found that 52% of respondents pointed to pay compression as a major source of dissatisfaction among employees.

These inequities can also stifle career growth. If salary ranges are too narrow, employees may see little financial reward in taking on more responsibility or seeking promotions, which can stall their professional development. This can lead to higher turnover rates, as workers leave for better pay elsewhere, driving up recruitment and training costs.

Defining a Compensation Strategy

Defining a compensation strategy that aligns with the organization’s business goals and values serves many purposes. For instance, tackling internal inequities requires a thoughtful approach to managing compensation. Annual salary reviews, market benchmarking, and clear education and communication to managers and employees are key steps to maintain internal equity within an organization while at the same time lending credence to the overall compensation strategy. Companies often benefit from implementing structured pay scales and conducting regular equity audits to spot and fix disparities. Be aware of pay equity reporting requirements which can vary by state or sometimes by city.

Another effective strategy is to create a clear compensation philosophy that explains how pay decisions are made, helping employees understand the reasons behind their salaries. This level of transparency can help educate employees as to the reasons for pay compression by giving employees a clearer idea of their earning opportunities tied to potential career paths within the company. For example, a compensation philosophy might include the principle of “internal equity,” ensuring that pay is consistently applied and communicated across similar roles and responsibilities within the organization. When done effectively internal equity creates a higher sense of trust among employees and leadership thus leading to increased employee satisfaction and retention. Another tenet could be “total rewards,” where compensation is viewed holistically, including not just salary but also benefits, bonuses, and professional development opportunities, to attract and retain talent.

Additionally, offering performance-based increases, and reassessing the pay of long-term employees can help maintain a fair balance between new hires and current staff. By aligning compensation strategies with strategic cascading organizational goals and market realities, companies can better manage the challenges of pay compression while promoting a culture of performance-based objectivity.

Conclusion

Internal equity and pay compression are crucial aspects of creating and maintaining a fair and effective compensation strategy. As companies continue to navigate the complexities of the modern job market and pending regulations, focusing on transparent, fair, and performance-based pay practices is essential for maintaining employee satisfaction and loyalty. By directly addressing pay inequities and fostering transparency and trust, companies will not only improve internal equity but also build a more resilient and motivated workforce.

Navigating pay compression and maintaining internal equity requires more than just adjusting numbers—it calls for strategic insight and careful analysis. Partnering with a compensation expert can provide the critical guidance needed to assess, address, and maintain fair pay practices. Whether it’s conducting equity analysis or developing performance-based compensation strategies, having a thought partner, like CCI Consulting, ensures that your approach is both equitable and aligned with your organization’s broader goals.

 

Jarrett Korn

Senior Human Resources Specialist

CCI Consulting